M.S. Tswett and the Invention of Chromatography

How a Botanist's Experiment Revolutionized Science

Scientific Discovery History of Science Botany

The Colors of Separation

Imagine a world without the ability to separate complex mixtures—where identifying performance-enhancing drugs in athletes, detecting pollutants in water, or analyzing forensic evidence at crime scenes would be nearly impossible. This was the scientific reality until just over a century ago, when an overlooked botanist with a multicultural background revolutionized chemical analysis through a simple yet profound experiment.

The story of chromatography begins not in a sophisticated laboratory, but with a glass tube filled with powdered chalk and an extract of green leaves. Its inventor, Mikhail Semyonovich Tswett (also spelled Tsvet), pioneered a technique that would eventually become indispensable across nearly every scientific field, though he received little recognition during his lifetime 3 5 .

This is the story of how a botanist's quest to understand plant pigments created a method that would separate and identify the very building blocks of our world.

Did You Know?

Chromatography is now used in over 90% of chemical analysis procedures worldwide, from pharmaceutical development to environmental monitoring.

The Botanist Behind the Breakthrough

M.S. Tswett

Born: 1872, Asti, Italy

Education: University of Geneva (PhD, 1896)

Key Achievement: Invention of chromatography (1903)

Languages: French, Russian, German, Italian

Mikhail S. Tswett's personal story reads like an international novel, filled with movement and multicultural influences that perhaps shaped his unconventional thinking. Born in 1872 in the Italian town of Asti, his mother was Italian while his father was a Ukrainian in the foreign service for the Russian Empire 3 .

Tragedy struck early when his mother died shortly after his birth, and his father took the infant to Switzerland, where he was raised by a caretaker 5 . Tswett grew up multilingual, speaking French as his first language while learning Russian from his father during annual visits, along with German and Italian 5 .

1872

Born in Asti, Italy to an Italian mother and Russian father

1896

Earned doctorate in botany from University of Geneva

1901

Secured position at University of Warsaw

1903

Performed landmark chromatography experiment

1919

Died without witnessing widespread adoption of his method

Tswett pursued his education in Switzerland, earning a doctorate in botany from the University of Geneva in 1896 with a dissertation on cell physiology and chloroplasts 3 5 . Hoping to contribute to science in his father's homeland, he moved to Russia, only to face immediate institutional barriers. His Swiss doctorate wasn't recognized in the Russian academic system, forcing him to complete additional requirements and eventually earn a Russian master's degree 3 5 .

He faced what he described as being "alien to everybody" in the Russian scientific establishment 5 .

Despite these challenges, Tswett secured a position at the University of Warsaw in 1901, where he would make his landmark discovery 5 . Colleagues described him as a lonely, dedicated scientist who sometimes even slept on a table in the botanical study 5 . This outsider status—both culturally and academically—perhaps fueled his willingness to challenge conventional scientific approaches and develop entirely new methodologies.

The Scientific Landscape: A Problem in Need of a Solution

In the early 20th century, the study of plant pigments presented a significant challenge for botanists and chemists. Chlorophyll, the green pigment essential for photosynthesis, was known to be a complex mixture rather than a single substance, but conventional techniques failed to separate its components without altering or destroying them 5 6 .

The prevailing methods of chemical analysis relied heavily on crystallization and distillation, which often led to decomposition of delicate organic compounds 6 .

Tswett recognized this fundamental limitation in his master's thesis research, criticizing the scientific community's uncritical acceptance of established techniques. He famously observed that "each generation inherits, as students do, techniques of the previous generation, and without subjecting them to serious criticism, being satisfied by the fact that they are generally accepted" 5 .

Scientific Challenges
  • Chlorophyll known to be a mixture
  • Conventional methods destroyed delicate compounds
  • No gentle separation techniques available
  • Need to study pigments in native state

His philosophical insight that "any scientific advance is an advance of the method" drove his search for a gentler approach to studying plant pigments in their native state 5 .

Tswett understood that pigments in leaves were bound to cellular structures by adsorption forces—the same physical phenomenon that causes gases to stick to solid surfaces. He hypothesized that different pigments had varying adsorption strengths, which explained why nonpolar solvents could extract weakly-adsorbed carotenes but required polar solvents like ethanol to dissolve the more strongly-adsorbed chlorophyll 5 . From this realization, it was a short conceptual leap to imagine using selective adsorption and desorption with appropriate adsorbents and solvents to separate these delicate compounds.

A Landmark Experiment Revealed: The First Chromatogram

The Experimental Setup

In 1903, while working at the University of Warsaw, Tswett performed what would become the foundational experiment of chromatography. His approach was elegant in its simplicity, using readily available materials to achieve what complex chemical procedures could not.

Experimental Components
  • Glass tube - separation chamber
  • Powdered chalk - stationary phase
  • Leaf extract - sample mixture
  • Petroleum ether - mobile phase
  • Pure solvent - eluent

Simplified representation of Tswett's chromatography column showing separated pigment bands

Step-by-Step Procedure

Tswett's Chromatography Process
1. Pack Column
2. Apply Sample
3. Separation
4. Development
5. Visualization

The execution of Tswett's experiment followed a remarkably straightforward sequence, yet produced revolutionary results:

  1. Packing the column: Tswett filled the glass tube with finely powdered chalk, creating a uniform, packed bed of solid adsorbent material 3 .
  2. Sample application: He carefully applied the leaf extract containing the mixture of chlorophylls and carotenoids to the top of the packed column 3 .
  3. Elution: As the pigment solution percolated down through the chalk packing under gravity, Tswett observed something remarkable—distinct bands began to form, separating from one another with clear boundaries 3 .
  4. Development: He continued to wash the column with additional pure solvent, which caused the separated bands to migrate downward at different rates, depending on their adsorption affinity for the stationary phase 3 .
  5. Visualization: The result was a stunning display of nature's palette—distinct zones of chlorophyll greens and carotenoid yellows, reds, and oranges arrayed along the length of the column 3 .

Tswett later likened this pattern to "light rays in a spectrum," which inspired the name he would eventually give to the technique: "chromatography" from the Greek words chroma (color) and graphein (to write)—literally, "color writing" 3 .

Materials in Tswett's Experiment
Material Function
Powdered chalk Stationary phase adsorbent
Glass tube Column housing
Leaf pigment extract Analyte mixture
Petroleum ether Mobile phase solvent
Separated Pigments
Pigment Color Migration
Carotenes Orange/Red Fastest
Xanthophylls Yellow Moderate
Chlorophyll a Blue-green Slow
Chlorophyll b Yellow-green Slowest

Results and Scientific Significance

The immediate visual result of Tswett's experiment was striking—a vibrant separation of plant pigments that had previously been impossible to resolve without chemical modification. But the true significance went far beyond this colorful display:

Proof of Complexity

Demonstrated chlorophyll was actually a mixture of multiple pigments

Mild Conditions

Separated compounds without altering their native structure

General Applicability

Recognized potential for separating colorless compounds too

The separation occurred because each pigment had a different balance between its solubility in the mobile phase (promoting movement) and its adsorption to the stationary phase (resisting movement). The more strongly adsorbed components moved slowly, while weakly adsorbed components traveled faster, resulting in physical separation.

A Method Ahead of Its Time: Initial Rejection and Eventual Acceptance

Despite the elegance and potential of his new method, Tswett's chromatography faced significant resistance from the scientific establishment. For nearly three decades after its invention, chromatography remained largely ignored 3 6 .

Factors Contributing to Rejection
Language Barriers 85%
Failed Reproductions 75%
Theoretical Limitations 70%
Departure from Convention 65%
Richard Willstätter

Nobel Laureate (1915) for work on chlorophyll who initially dismissed Tswett's method after failed reproduction attempts 3 .

Nobel Prize 1915

Several factors contributed to this delayed acceptance:

  1. Language barriers: Tswett published most of his early work in Russian, limiting its dissemination to Western European scientists who dominated chemical research at the time 3 .
  2. Failed reproductions: When renowned chemist Richard Willstätter attempted to replicate Tswett's experiments, he used an overly strong adsorbent that destroyed the chlorophyll, leading him to dismiss the method 3 . Willstätter's considerable reputation and subsequent Nobel Prize for work on chlorophyll meant his negative experience carried significant weight 3 .
  3. Theoretical limitations: Chromatography lacked a theoretical foundation that could explain why it worked, making it difficult for scientists steeped in traditional chemical theory to accept 6 .
  4. Departure from convention: Chromatography didn't fit established paradigms of chemical analysis like crystallization or distillation, making it seem unfamiliar and suspect to contemporary chemists 6 .

As one scholar noted, chromatography had "neither theoretical justification nor practical precedent" in the chemical canon of the early 20th century 6 . This resistance exemplifies what historian Gunther Stent called "premature discovery"—a scientific advance so radical that the field lacks the conceptual framework to accommodate it.

Tswett further complicated matters by engaging in a vitriolic debate with prominent chlorophyll chemist Leon Marchlewski from 1906-1909, which spanned 125 pages across fifteen articles 6 . This public dispute with an established authority likely further marginalized Tswett and his method within the chemical community.

Tragically, Tswett died in 1919 without witnessing the eventual acceptance and transformation of his method, his contributions remaining in what historian Eugene Garfield called "obliteration by incorporation"—where a fundamental discovery becomes so integrated into scientific practice that its origin is forgotten 3 .

The Inevitable Triumph of an Idea: Rediscovery and Legacy

Chromatography's potential was too great to remain dormant forever. In the 1930s, the method was rediscovered and refined by organic chemists Edgar Lederer and Arthur Winterstein, who used it to separate carotenoids 6 . This rediscovery launched chromatography into the scientific mainstream, where it would rapidly evolve into numerous variants and applications.

Nobel Prize-Winning Advancements

1952: Partition Chromatography
Nobel
Archer J.P. Martin & Richard L.M. Synge

Revolutionized separation science, enabled new analytical capabilities

1958: Protein Sequencing
Nobel
Frederick Sanger

First sequencing of a protein (insulin) using paper chromatography

1972: Enzyme Structure
Nobel
Stanford Moore & William H. Stein

Structural studies of ribonuclease using chromatography

1980: DNA Sequencing
Nobel
Frederick Sanger (shared)

Nucleic acid sequencing methods enabling genome projects

As one commentator observed, "Methodological and instrumentational advances are always the motors of progress in scientific research" 3 . Chromatography, alongside X-ray crystallography, stands as one of the two methodological advances with the "extraordinary impact on research" in 20th-century chemistry 3 .

Modern Chromatography Techniques

Gas Chromatography (GC)

Separates volatile compounds 2

HPLC

High-performance liquid chromatography 2

Thin-Layer (TLC)

Simple, accessible analysis 2

Ion-Exchange

Separates charged molecules 2

These techniques now form the backbone of applications ranging from pharmaceutical development to environmental monitoring, forensic science to clinical diagnostics.

Conclusion: An Enduring Legacy

Mikhail Tswett's journey from a marginalized botanist to the unwitting father of a transformative scientific method represents both the challenges of innovation and the ultimate triumph of a powerful idea. His simple glass tube packed with chalk has evolved into sophisticated instruments that form the bedrock of modern analytical science, though his name remains largely unknown outside scientific circles.

The story of chromatography reminds us that scientific progress often depends on methodological innovations that create new ways of seeing and manipulating the world. As Stanford Moore and William H. Stein noted in their 1972 Nobel lecture, chromatography enabled a "renaissance" in chemical and biological research 3 .

The Colors of Science

Today, chromatography touches nearly every aspect of modern life—from ensuring the safety of our food and water, to developing new medicines, to monitoring environmental pollution. The next time you hear about athletes being tested for banned substances, water quality being verified, or new drugs being approved, remember the Russian botanist and his colorful columns—a testament to how a simple yet profound idea can ultimately transform our world, one separation at a time.

References